Current Treatment Strategies for Malignant Gliomas
a report by
Chairman, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich
Anaplastic astrocytomas, oligoastrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas (World Health Organization (WHO) grade III) and glioblastomas (WHO grade IV) are collectively referred to as malignant gliomas, whereas WHO grade I and II gliomas are designated low-grade gliomas.1 For decades, neurosurgical resection – whenever possible – and post-operative radiotherapy have been the cornerstones of treatment for malignant gliomas. Most chemotherapeutic agents active in other types of cancer produced little benefit for glioma patients, with the possible exception of nitrosoureas. In contrast, recent years have seen significant advances in the fields of neurosurgical resection, radio-oncological treatment approaches and, most significantly, medical therapy (see Table 1), exemplified by the approval of temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.2
The classic treatment of anaplastic glioma included resection wherever feasible and radiotherapy of the tumour with a peri-tumoral safety margin of 2–3cm. Until a few years ago, gliomas of WHO grades III and IV were collectively considered malignant gliomas and enrolled into common clinical trials, which mostly evaluated the role of radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, it then became clear that WHO grade III anaplastic gliomas had a much better prognosis than glioblastomas, necessitating separate clinical trials for these tumour entities. For instance, in a recent large meta-analysis3 the two-year survival rates were 9 and 13%, respectively, for glioblastoma patients treated initially with radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy, but 31 and 37%, respectively, for patients with anaplastic gliomas.3
Retrospective data suggest that anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours have a better prognosis than anaplastic pure astrocytic gliomas, with mixed oligoastrocytomas probably having an intermediate prognosis. In particular, it was felt that oligodendroglial tumours showed a more favourable response to chemotherapy. This led to an increased awareness of possible oligodendroglial components within malignant gliomas and an increase in their diagnosis, probably driven by the concern that a possibly effective
Michael Weller is Chairman of the Department of Neurology at University Hospital Zurich, a position he has held since 2005. He has also served as Chair of the Neuro-Oncology Group of the German Cancer Society since 2001, and as Chair of the German Glioma Network of German Cancer Aid since 2004. Dr Weller was the German principal investigator (PI) in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) trial
of temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, and is the PI for the German multicentre trials of radiotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic glioma (NOA-04) and elderly patients with malignant glioma (NOA-08). He studied medicine in Tübingen and Würzburg, Germany; Zurich, Switzerland; and Bethesda, Maryland, US.
Prospective data for the major prognostic role of these genetic losses come from two recent randomised clinical trials: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94-02 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 26951, which compared radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus PCV in anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours.4,5 Further data have to mature from the RTOG 01-31 trial, which investigates the effect of pre-irradiation temozolomide. Both RTOG 94-02 and EORTC 26951 indicate that PCV added to radiotherapy increases progression-free survival, whereas there is no significant effect on overall survival. The failure of combined modality treatment as the first-line therapy to increase overall survival may result from the known efficacy of the treatment at recurrence – e.g. PCV when given as a salvage treatment at recurrence after radiotherapy. Interestingly, both trials also show, for the first time in a prospective setting, that the combined loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 1p and 19q was an important predictor of longer progression-free survival and overall survival, but that this effect was independent of the initial treatment, whether radiotherapy alone or radiochemotherapy. It is important to note that both trials were designed to evaluate all anaplastic oligodendroglial tumours regardless of genotype, and any conclusions regarding the 1p/19q deleted/non-deleted subgroups have to be looked at with the limitations of a subgroup analysis. With these precautions in mind, 1p/19q status cannot be used to guide treatment decisions, but is solely a prognostic marker at present. Altogether, patients with 1p/19q-deleted oligodendroglial tumours may expect a median overall survival of six to seven years, whereas patients with 1p/19q-non-deleted tumours experience a median survival of two to three years, similar to the range expected for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma.
Further important information will be gained from the results of the German NOA-04, which enrolled 318 patients with all three types of anaplastic glioma and randomised them between radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy alone, using either the PCV regime or temozolomide (see Figure 1). Among others, this study will possibly identify a population of patients in whom radiotherapy can be safely deferred, and will also provide the first head-to-head comparison of PCV and temozolomide.
In the light of these data, it is important to design separate trials to optimise the treatment for 1p/19 intact and 1p/19q co-deleted tumours.
EORTC, the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC), RTOG, the Medical Research Council (MRC) and High-priority Undertakings in Brain Tumors (HUB) have agreed on a concept for a multinational, four-armed trial termed CATNON for patients with anaplastic glioma without 1p/19q loss. CATNON will examine the role of chemotherapy, substituting PCV for temozolomide, in the concurrent or adjuvant setting. The study arms will include radiotherapy alone, radiotherapy plus concurrent temozolomide, radiotherapy plus adjuvant temozolomide and radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Chemotherapy will be administered for six months, but can be continued for up to 12 months for stable or responding patients. Patients will be stratified for O6methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation status. This study will be designed to identify the impact of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide on overall survival in this patient cohort. A second companion protocol for 1p/19q-deleted tumours will probably compare radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone and radiochemotherapy using temozolomide. This trial will thus combine features of NOA-04 (see Figure 1) and the EORTC NCIC trial for glioblastoma.2
As with anaplastic glioma, the classic treatment of glioblastoma includes surgical resection when feasible and radiotherapy of the tumour with a peri-tumoral safety margin of 2–3cm. However, while the role of radiotherapy has not been questioned for decades,6 the value of surgical resection was confirmed in a randomised trial only in 2006, by Stummer and colleagues.7 Using the fluorescent marker 5-aminolevulinic acid to delineate the tumour area under the surgical microscope, they demonstrated an enhanced progression-free survival rate at six months in patients who had a complete resection defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
The approval in around 2005 of the novel alkylating agent temozolomide – which had previously been registered for recurrent anaplastic gliomas and glioblastomas – for use in newly diagnosed glioblastoma was probably the most encouraging step ahead in the medical management of malignant gliomas in the last few decades. The EORTC 26981-22981 NCIC CE.3 trial compared radiotherapy alone with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide added to radiotherapy. It demonstrated an increase in median survival from 12.1 to 14.6 months and of the two-year survival rate from 10 to 26% in patients receiving temozolomide.2 In particular, patients with tumours exhibiting methylation of the promoter region of the MGMT gene showed a striking benefit from temozolomide.8 The encouraging results of the EORTC NCIC trial have led to intensified experimental and clinical efforts to improve the treatment of malignant gliomas. These efforts include the development of alternative dosing schedules of temozolomide, as realised in the ongoing RTOG EORTC trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (three weeks on, one week off) and the German NOA-08 trial for malignant astrocytomas (grades III and IV) in the elderly (one week on, one week off), as well as these and various other regimens for recurrent disease.9
The introduction of temozolomide for the treatment of malignant glioma has resulted in a renaissance of interest in clinical trials for patients with results from most of these trials are likely to be available within the next one or two years, and will hopefully enrich the currently limited repertoire of treatment options for malignant glioma patients.
1 Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, World Health Organization 3. Glioma Meta-analysis Trialists Group, Lancet, 2002;359: 6. Laperriere N, et al., Radiother Oncol, 2002;64:259–73. Classification of Tumours, Pathology & Genetics, Tumours of the 1011–18. 7. Stummer W, et al., Lancet Oncol, 2006;7:392–401. Nervous System, IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2000. 4. Van den Bent MJ, et al., J Clin Oncol, 2006;24:2715–22. 8. Hegi ME, et al., N Engl J Med, 2005;352:997–1003.
2 Stupp R, et al., N Engl J Med, 2005;352:987–96. 5. Cairncross G, et al., J Clin Oncol, 2006;24:2707–14. 9. Wick W, et al., Neurology, 2004;62:2113–15.